Information Manipulation and Reform in Authoritarian Regimes*
نویسندگان
چکیده
We develop a theory of how an authoritarian regime interactively uses information manipulation, such as propaganda or censorship, and policy improvement to maintain social stability. The government can depict the status quo policy more popularly supported than it actually is, while at the same time please citizens directly by enacting a costly reform. We show that the government’s ability of making policy concessions reduces its incentive to manipulate information and improves its credibility. Anticipating a higher chance of policy concessions and less information manipulation, citizens are more likely to believe the government-provided information and support the regime. Our model provides an explanation for the puzzling fact that reform coexists with selective information disclosure in authoritarian countries like China.
منابع مشابه
Does Leaders ’ Western Education Matter to Authoritarian Regimes ’ Reform ? (
Does Leaders’ Western Education Matter to Authoritarian Regimes’ Reform? (1960-2000) by Mingzhe Xu Department of Political Science Duke University Date:______________________ Approved: ________________________ Joseph Grieco, Supervisor ______________________ Emerson Niou _______________________ Bahar Leventoglu An abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the...
متن کاملAnti-regime Uprisings and the Emergence of Electoral Authoritarianism
This paper explores the role of threats from below in the emergence of electoral authoritarianism. Mass uprisings for democratic regime change undermine closed authoritarian regimes by making it difficult for autocrats to maintain their regimes through repression and co-optation. Anti-regime uprisings also promote the establishment of electoral authoritarianism by toppling existing closed regim...
متن کاملInstitutions of the Offensive : Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes , 1950 – 1992
What are the most important sources of institutional variation among authoritarian regimes, and how do such institutions influence these dictatorships’ propensity to initiate military disputes? This article argues that most existing studies in both comparative politics and international relations employ a flawed conceptualization of authoritarian institutions. Excessive focus on the personaliza...
متن کاملDeliberate Disengagement: How Education Can Decrease Political Participation in Electoral Authoritarian Regimes
A large literature examining advanced and consolidating democracies suggests that education increases political participation. However, in electoral authoritarian regimes, educated voters may instead deliberately disengage. If education increases critical capacities, political awareness, and support for democracy, educated citizens may believe that participation is futile or legitimates autocra...
متن کاملThe Challenge of Semi-Authoritarianism: An Introduction
the last decade of the twentieth century saw the rise of a great number of regimes that cannot be easily classified as either authoritarian or democratic but display some characteristics of both—in short, they are semi-authoritarian regimes. They are ambiguous systems that combine rhetorical acceptance of liberal democracy, the existence of some formal democratic institutions, and respect for a...
متن کامل